Digital Martial Law: 10 scary things about the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
Digital Martial Law: 10 scary things about the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
reiterating sarcastic but meaningful sense on the issue:
>tagged as ‘mala prohibita law’-an accepted legal rule that offenses under special laws—so bawal na magjoke F@#K!
>You’re damned if you’re lying and you’re damned if you’re telling the truth.—what’s the deal with this? or is there even a deal with this?
>The law says, if you can’t say anything good, then you better not say anything at all. That’s great for petty issues but not when we’re talking about people who use their position to take advantage of defenseless individuals.—hindi lahat ng tao ganun kabait.. even the considered good ones have a dark side indeed. darker than what you think maybe.
>It’s an I Know What You Posted Several Summers Ago scenario.—may ganon? so sige kalkalin nyo isa isa lahat ng profiles. haram! pati ako kulong neto!
>the act of clicking the “Like” button of Facebook or retweeting posts on Twitter may be tagged as unlawful as well.— super unlike!
>If a woman sends a picture of herself eating ice cream in a suggestive manner to her boyfriend, will she be stoned to death sent to jail if someone rats her out?—e kung tumira nalang kau ng stone?hehe #gofigureidiots
>You don’t have to directly call someone a liar and a thief to get sued for libel.—sarcasm. my forte! two points!haha
>No court intervention is needed, the DOJ can go right ahead and compel you to stop publishing your posts.—you are under arrest for posting on facebook. gara! steeg!hahaha
>Would you rather shell out the hefty amount that would kill you or would you rather waste 12 years of your life behind bars, where, at some point, you’d wish you were dead?—i would rather join the campaign and stop this law before every living creature who has facebook, twitter, tumblr and blogger like me goes to jail because of the so-called “digital martial law”.
>tagged as ‘mala prohibita law’-an accepted legal rule that offenses under special laws—so bawal na magjoke F@#K!
>You’re damned if you’re lying and you’re damned if you’re telling the truth.—what’s the deal with this? or is there even a deal with this?
>The law says, if you can’t say anything good, then you better not say anything at all. That’s great for petty issues but not when we’re talking about people who use their position to take advantage of defenseless individuals.—hindi lahat ng tao ganun kabait.. even the considered good ones have a dark side indeed. darker than what you think maybe.
>It’s an I Know What You Posted Several Summers Ago scenario.—may ganon? so sige kalkalin nyo isa isa lahat ng profiles. haram! pati ako kulong neto!
>the act of clicking the “Like” button of Facebook or retweeting posts on Twitter may be tagged as unlawful as well.— super unlike!
>If a woman sends a picture of herself eating ice cream in a suggestive manner to her boyfriend, will she be stoned to death sent to jail if someone rats her out?—e kung tumira nalang kau ng stone?hehe #gofigureidiots
>You don’t have to directly call someone a liar and a thief to get sued for libel.—sarcasm. my forte! two points!haha
>No court intervention is needed, the DOJ can go right ahead and compel you to stop publishing your posts.—you are under arrest for posting on facebook. gara! steeg!hahaha
>Would you rather shell out the hefty amount that would kill you or would you rather waste 12 years of your life behind bars, where, at some point, you’d wish you were dead?—i would rather join the campaign and stop this law before every living creature who has facebook, twitter, tumblr and blogger like me goes to jail because of the so-called “digital martial law”.
Comments
Post a Comment